WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners.
By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles.
Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.”
Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime.
Caitlin Clark returns for 2nd half against Sun after apparent left leg injury in 1st half
Experts Discuss Progress of Chinese Women at UNESCO Forum
Beijing Winter Olympics Press Facilities Named Best in 2022 by AIPS
People's Daily Life During New Year Holiday Across China
What to stream: Lenny Kravitz, South Park, 'Dune: Part 2'
Cut Flower Develops Well in Zhaoxian Town, Shandong
InPics: New Year Fair Adds Happiness on Guizhou's 'Slow Trains'
Pogacar extends Giro lead to over 7 minutes after winning altered Stage 16 amid protests at start
2022 China (Hainan) Int'l Tropical Agricultural Products Winter Trade Fair Kicks Off
Judge in Trump’s hush money trial did not bar campaign finance expert from testifying for defense
1.52 Mln People Sit China's Civil Servant Exam